<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are you using rock, paper, scissors as decision-support?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.kinaxis.com2007/05/are-you-using-rock-paper-scissors-as-decision-support/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.kinaxis.com/2007/05/are-you-using-rock-paper-scissors-as-decision-support/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 18:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Randy Littleson</title>
		<link>http://blog.kinaxis.com/2007/05/are-you-using-rock-paper-scissors-as-decision-support/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Littleson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 18:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://127.0.0.1:88/2007/05/are-you-using-rock-paper-scissors-as-decision-support/#comment-22</guid>
		<description>I agree there are a ton of issues that go into making the determination of whether to outsource or not (I know the folks at Technology Forecasters Inc actually do quite a bit of work in helping companies build the business case and analyze these issues).

The point here was not to evaluate the decision to outsource per se, but to focus on the implications of dealing with ever present change within an outsourced environment.  While the ideal scenario would see these considerations brought into the outsourcing decision criteria, my experience has been that it just isn't the case today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree there are a ton of issues that go into making the determination of whether to outsource or not (I know the folks at Technology Forecasters Inc actually do quite a bit of work in helping companies build the business case and analyze these issues).</p>
<p>The point here was not to evaluate the decision to outsource per se, but to focus on the implications of dealing with ever present change within an outsourced environment.  While the ideal scenario would see these considerations brought into the outsourcing decision criteria, my experience has been that it just isn&#8217;t the case today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anand Pole</title>
		<link>http://blog.kinaxis.com/2007/05/are-you-using-rock-paper-scissors-as-decision-support/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Anand Pole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 03:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://127.0.0.1:88/2007/05/are-you-using-rock-paper-scissors-as-decision-support/#comment-21</guid>
		<description>The white paper talks about analysing the cost of out sourcing, but my view is that it is not throwing any light on capital invesment needed if we do not out source, also the reduction in rejection levels inhouse and outsource saves lot of value , because we get 100% OK material or we pay only for 100% ok material only, i request to Author of this white paper to give his valuable thought on this aspect of out sourcing

with Regards
AD Pole
Manager Commercial
NRB Bearings.Ltd
Mumbai(India)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The white paper talks about analysing the cost of out sourcing, but my view is that it is not throwing any light on capital invesment needed if we do not out source, also the reduction in rejection levels inhouse and outsource saves lot of value , because we get 100% OK material or we pay only for 100% ok material only, i request to Author of this white paper to give his valuable thought on this aspect of out sourcing</p>
<p>with Regards<br />
AD Pole<br />
Manager Commercial<br />
NRB Bearings.Ltd<br />
Mumbai(India)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
 
