4 Responses to “Colleen “Coco” Crum: Advances in communicating information across a supply chain aid in better decision making and collaboration”

  1. Rajesh Kumar

    As a first time reader, let me say you have a nice blog out here. Coming back to cloud computing, the overall challenge I see is that there is a wide sense of expectation around CC, and an overarching belief that an adoption is a almost certain eventuality. The key question of how are yet to be answered. As a company, I would want to really be in control over my data. With current level of technology evolution, one feels that that sense of absolute control would be gone. That’s quite a challenge. If I have huge amount of customer data, would I trust it to the cloud? Perhaps not. More so when privacy issues are responsible and I know I am accountable.

  2. Trevor Miles

    Hi Rajesh, many thanks for your complement fo our blog. We try hard to make it topical, so it is great to get some feedback.

    Without a doubt this is the number one concern about not only cloud computing (CC), but a more common subset of CC, software-as-a-service (SaaS). Data security is closely followed by service level or up time as the greatest stated risk of both CC and SaaS. And possibly the greatest unknown is what happenes if the CC company goes out of business?

    Yet time and again studies show that the greatest data security risks come from personnel downloading data to their laptops of printing out reports, and leaving both is public places. In addition, access to company data centres by non-authorized personnel is at best not as secure as it could be. While having your data in the cloud does not prevent your employeeds from downloading data or printing reports, access to the data center itself is usually of a much higher standard of security.

    The issues of up-time reminds me of the difference between deaths in plane accidents and those in car accidents. Whenever a Google Apps or Salesforce goes down unexpectedly, there is a flurry of activity in the blogosphere and even in the more regular press, yet there is no mention to what degree on-premise applications go out of service. Similarly, when a plane goes down and all the passengers are killed and the plane crash makes news world-wide, yet no-one mentions the fact that in 2003 there were 42,884 road deaths in the USA alone. If we assume 200 people per plane, that is the equivalent of 214 plane crashes. According to the Aircraft Crash Records Office in Geneva, in 2003 there were 198 plane crashes world-wide in which 1,224 people died. I suspect if on-premise uptime was analysed in detail, the result would show very similar characteristics.

    The last often quoted risk is CC companies going out of business. I think this risk has the most qualitatively or quantitatively difference between an on-premise software provider and a SaaS/CC provider. If the software is installed on-premise using company owned servers, even if the software provider goes out of business, the company can continue to use the software until such time as a replacement can be found and installed. While on the surface it would seem that a SaaS vendor going out would be a lot more catastophic, I think there are ways of mitigationg the risk. First of all, to the best of my knowledge, no SaaS vendor has gone out of business. Second, most SaaS providers use large hosting centers to run their software. I am sure that the hosting centers will be only too happy to enter into a contract to continue hosting the software for a fee.

    I do not want to belittle your concerns Rajesh. All I want to do is point out that many of the the stated objections have little basis in fact. The issue is that statistics are great on average, but provide little guidance in the specifics. We have aerospace and defence companies running our software in our SaaS environment. yet your circumstances may indeed indicate that SaaS is not the right option for your company.

    Regards
    Trevor Miles
    Kinaxis

  3. Rajesh Kumar

    Thanks for the debate Trevor. Count me a regular.

  4. SaaS/ Cloud Computing versus the perceived disconnect with Data Security | The Y-AXIS LIVE!

    [...] Trevor at Kinaxis blog has an interesting argument. He says one of the big issues in Cloud Computing is if the company hosting the CC goes bust, how do you get the data secured? He argues that the on-premise applications are no more secure than those based on the cloud. He also argues that data can be lost by way of a simple printout, which can happen either way. I go with Trevor. Every year we read about sensitive data lost via misplaced or stolen laptops or disks lost in transit, including credit card data. Why, a senior British law enforcement official recently lost his job because he carried a printout of a plan the cover page of which was visible to the media, thereby compromising on the operation. [...]

Leave a Reply